Legal Opinion

Waldo v. Angomar

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 15, 1857PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from the Fourth District Court of New Orleans, Reynolds, J.

1Opinion of the CourtLea, J.

The plaintiffs allege that, being judgment creditors of Eugene Angoma/r, they caused to be seized on execution the steamer Red River, the property of said Angoma/r.

They further allege that certain judgment creditors of James TP! Moore have seized the said steamer, by virtue of writs of fieri facias issued in their respective suits; that said steamer is not the property of Moore, but that of their .judgment debtor, Angoma/i'; that the sale made to Moore, if any such sale was made, is simulated and made to defeat the rights of the plaintiff; they pray that the steamer Red River be decreed,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Davidson v. Frost-Johnson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  2. Buras v. MacHellaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  3. Briel v. Postal Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  4. Davidson v. FletcherSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API