Legal Opinion

McLennan v. Cole

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1923No. Docket No. 105PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

This suit was begun in the name of plaintiff McLennan as assignee of Arthur F. Brook-man, a real estate broker in Detroit, to enforce payment by defendant Cole of a claim against him for $10,000, less $250 already paid, as commission alleged to have been earned by Brookman as agent for Cole in the sale of his 140-acre farm located near Mt. Clemens, Michigan. McLennan did not appear at the hearing as a witness and Brookman’s interest in the case being recognized he was impleaded as a plaintiff.

Defendant Cole was a farmer, 78 years old at the time of the hearing, in 1922, had lived near Mt.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Plugger v. Township Board of OverysselMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Moore v. MandlebaumMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Michigan Crown Fender Co. v. WelchMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  4. McNutt v. DixMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Hogle v. MeyeringMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. GoldenMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Union Guardian Trust Co. v. StillmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Broughton v. Detroit Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Guggisberg v. Otsego County Co-Operative Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API