Williams v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.
As a basis for review defendant alleges the following grounds:
1. He was denied a speedy trial;
2. he was denied his right to be present at all proceedings in a criminal matter;
3. there is insufficient credible evidence to sustain his conviction; and
4. a new trial should be granted in the interest of justice.
Speedy Trial.
Art. I, sec. 7 of the Wisconsin Constitution and the sixth amendment of the United States Constitution guarantee an accused the right to a speedy trial.
“. . . A speedy trial, generally speaking, is one conducted according to prevailing rules, regulations and proceedings of law,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. EwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Pollard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Beavers v. HaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- State v. BrodsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Commodore v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. ShearsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Day v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Leroux v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- May v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.