Legal Opinion

Corcoran v. Higgins

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 27, 1907PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.

This is a bastardy complaint. The case has been tried three times in the Superior Court. At the first trial *292there was a verdict of “not guilty.” On motion of the complainant this was set aside. No exception was taken by the defendant to the allowance of the motion or to the order granting a new trial. At the second trial there was a disagreement. Before the jury were empanelled the defendant moved that he be discharged on the ground that he already had been found “ not guilty.” The motion was denied and the defendant duly excepted. At the third trial there was a verdict of “ guilty.” Before…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Custy v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  2. Davis v. CarpenterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  3. Riley v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  4. Cheshire v. Adams & Cheshire Reservoir Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  5. Conefy v. HollandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Devine's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  2. Hey v. PrimeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  3. Commonwealth v. LoboMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. DiasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. MekelburgMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API