Legal Opinion

Kirkpatrick v. Jenkins

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1896PublishedCited by 20 opinions

PROM 'DAVIDSON. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Davidson County. J. W. BoNNEr, J.

1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, J.

The record in this case presents a contest over a paper writing, alleged to be the last will and testament of Samuel Jenkins, who died in 1888, leaving six children — three sons and three daughters. The alleged will gives all of the alleged testator’s large estate to his three sons and their children, without so much as mentioning the names *87or the existence of his 'daughters, or any of them. One of those daughters, Mattie B., and her husband, W. H. Kirkpatrick, deny the validity of that paper, and say that it is the result of undue influence, and that Samuel Jenkins did not have sufficient…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Shailer v. BumsteadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  2. Thompson v. IshSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
  3. Waterman v. . WhitneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  4. Gilbert v. GilbertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
  5. Foster v. DearbornSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Estate of GleasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Power Packing Co. v. BorumCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928
  3. Railroad v. AbernatheyTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Gwin v. GwinIdaho Supreme Court · 1897
  5. In Re Estate of EdenCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API