Legal Opinion

Mauro v. Mearsheimer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 26, 1994PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.), dated January 11, 1993, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the ground that the plaintiff Carol Mauro did not suffer a serious injury, and dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is denied.

We find that the Supreme Court erred in granting summary judgment to the defendants in this case. The defendants’ own submissions, which include a report from the defendants’ own…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Licari v. ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Scheer v. KoubekNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Partlow v. MeehanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Petrone v. ThorntonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. Redmond v. SchultzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jacobsen v. MoralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Parker v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Ventarola v. Reyes-NarvaezDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API