G.G. v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting in Part and Denying in Part the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment; Denying the Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The plaintiffs here are G.G., a minor child who is eligible to receive special education services, and his parents. G.G. attended a public school in the District of Columbia through the second grade, but after he was diagnosed with Asperger Syndrome, his parents placed him in a nonpublic school in Maryland. His parents subsequently filed a due process complaint against the District of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Florence County School District Four v. Carter Ex Rel. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Reid Ex Rel. Reid v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Q. C-C. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Adams ex rel. T.J. v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Wimbish v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- J.B. v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Lague v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.