Legal Opinion
Lemoyne Arms, Inc. v. Central New York Power Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 31, 1948PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSearl, J.
The motion, by order to show cause, returnable January 22d, is made by Public Service Commission, intervener, for judgment and dismissal of the complaint (Bules Civ. Prac., rule 107, subd. 2): “ That the court has not jurisdiction of the subject of the action.”
The amended complaint alleges in part that defendant is sole supplier to the public of Syracuse of electricity and gas for light, heat, and power; plaintiff, or its predecessor, in January, 1947, arranged for construction of several apartment houses' to be heated by gas, and in February, 1947, advised defendant of intention to construct…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Merchants Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Siler v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. International Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- People v. . O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. Puritan Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Figari v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- Lee v. Consolidated Edison Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1978
- Lotto v. Long Island Lighting Co.New York Supreme Court · 1974
- Potash Co. of America v. New Mexico Public Service CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
- Cardone v. Consolidated Edison Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.