Legal Opinion

Seitter v. City of St. Joseph

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 4, 1962No. 23575PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROSS, Judge.

Plaintiff received personal injuries when she stepped into a rut and fell while walking across a street intersection. The defendant city appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict awarding plaintiff damages in the sum of $3200.00.

It is suggested in plaintiff’s brief that the appeal should be dismissed for defendant’s failure to comply with Civil Rule 83.05, V.A.M.R. Plaintiff complains that defendant’s brief does not contain a fair and concise statement of facts and lacks specific page references to the appeal transcript as required by the cited rule. In our discretion we…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ryan v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  2. Taylor v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  3. Brock v. Gulf, Mobile and Ohio Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  4. Maxwell v. Kansas City, Mo.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1932
  5. Stratton v. City of Kansas City, MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Young v. PriceHawaii Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Lynn v. METROPOLITAN UTILITIES DISTRICTNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Pagan v. City of KennettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Moore v. DamosMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Word v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API