Legal Opinion

In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of Dooper

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided January 22, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Schulz, S.:

Notices on behalf of some of the respondents who are contesting the probate of the last will and testament of the decedent were served upon the attorneys .for the proponent, requiring three persons and one corporation whose names are in the will to appear and be examined as adverse parties.

Upon the day fixed for such examination the attorneys for the proponent requested an adjournment which was granted. Subsequently they made a motion to vacate such notices. It is now urged that by reason of the adjournment the notices in question may not be vacated. (Sutphin Realty Co. v. Breinig,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of VailNew York Surrogate's Court · 1923
  2. W. L. Sutphin Realty Co. v. BreinigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Probate of the Will of DraisinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1958
  2. In re the Estate of SmithNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  3. In re the Probate of the Will of GehlertNew York Surrogate's Court · 1942
  4. In re the Probate of the Will of StumpfNew York Surrogate's Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API