Legal Opinion

Ashuelot R. R. v. Elliot

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided August 5, 1878PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion, for a rehearing of questions decided in 52 N. H. 387, and 57 N. H. 397.

1Opinion of the CourtDoe, C. J.

As there has been a trial by the master since the announcement of the decisions which we are asked to reconsider, the motion for a rehearing is not seasonably made. And as justice has been done by a special revisory decree, adjusting the accounts of the parties upon equitable principles, there is nothing to take the case out of the general rule which requires such a motion to be presented before the questions of fact are tried in pursuance of the decision of law. But we have not allowed the position of the case to prevent a consideration of the argument advanced against the former decision on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac Railroad v. Louisa RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1852

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1891
  2. Preston v. Travellers' Ins.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1879
  3. State v. U. S. & Canada Express Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API