Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Conrad

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County

Decided February 9, 1950No. 22PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PiNOLA, J.,

The bill in this case having been dismissed at the request of plaintiff, we have before us defendants’ reinstated petition asking that plaintiff be required to pay their costs and expenses, including a reasonable counsel fee under section 17 of the Labor Anti-Injunction Act of June 2, 1937, P. L. 1198.

On October 30, 1948, plaintiff filed a bill seeking to enjoin defendants from picketing at his motion picture theatre at 34 East Main Street, in the Borough of Plymouth. A rule was granted to show cause why the injunction should not issue, and by decision rendered January 20, 1949, it…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wallace's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Sauber v. Nouskajian Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Adam Hat Stores, Inc. v. LefcoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. J.A. Wright v. Lower Salford Twp. Municipal Police Pension FundCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API