Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gavagan v. Marshall

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 13, 1948Published

1DissentAdams, J.

I think the statute as framed is calculated to coerce the exercise of judicial opinion. The question of whether to hold an inquest frequently requires the exercise of judicial discretion and is just as important as actually holding the inquest. The Constitution vests that discretion in the Justice of the Peace. Article V, Section 22, Florida Constitution. To say that this constitutional officer cannot receive his usual and lawful fees, unless and except in cases where he first procures the approval of a person who in no sense shares the judicial responsibility, can have no other effect than…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ruff v. Georgia, Southern & Florida Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1914
  2. Thursby v. StewartSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  3. State ex rel. Cartmel v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1922
  4. Rollo v. WigginsSupreme Court of Florida · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API