Legal Opinion

United States v. Ahmed

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 13, 2020No. 18-550-crUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

18-550-cr United States v. Ahmed UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. United States v. RigasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. VerkhoglyadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  4. Honeycutt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  5. United States v. BroxmeyerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API