Legal Opinion

Ravenna Nat. Bank v. Latimer

Cuyahoga Circuit Court

Decided October 29, 1906Published

Error to Cuyahoga common pleas court.

1Opinion of the CourtMarvin, J.

Suit was brought by the bank against Latimer on a promissory ■note, and an order of attachment was issued against the defendant upon an affidavit filed by the plaintiff’s attorney, charging as grounds therefor that the defendant was about to sell and convert his property, or a part thereof, into money for the purpose of placing it beyond the reach of his creditors, and that said defendant had property or rights in action which he concealed.

The defendant moved to discharge the attachment on various grounds, none of which need here be considered except the third and fourth grounds. These read:

“3…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hanks v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API