Legal Opinion

Geils v. Penn Sheraton Corp.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided December 24, 1952No. 1202Published

1Opinion of the Court

Bok, P. J.,

Defendant, a hotel, had plaintiff, who was one of its guests, arrested because of plaintiff’s long arrearages in his hotel bill. The criminal process having terminated in plaintiff’s discharge, he brought his action for malicious prosecution. The jury found in his favor.

*411Defendant’s motion for judgment n. o. v. must be granted.

Innkeepers, by the peculiar nature of their trade that requires them to take in the traveling public, need the special protection given them by the Act of June 24, 1939, P. L. 872, sec. 871, 18 PS §4871:

“Whoever, with intent to cheat or defraud, shall obtain…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. De ArmitSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881
  2. Miller v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Curley v. Automobile Finance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Groda v. American Stores CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Prough v. EntrikenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1849

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API