Legal Opinion

Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United States, as Successor to the Alien Property Custodian v. Schering Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 17, 1956No. 18-3554PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

This case presents questions under the Trading With the Enemy Act, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1 et seq. The Attorney General, as successor to the Alien Property Custodian, brought an action to enjoin alleged violation of an agreement entered into between his predecessor and the defendant in January, 1952, and for a declaratory judgment that the agreement was valid. The defendant by way of counterclaim asked for recision. In the district court the plaintiff was given what he asked for and the counterclaim was dismissed. D.C.D.N.J.1955, 129 F.Supp. 879. No questions of fact are involved.

Judge…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brownell v. Schering CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1955

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jennings v. ReedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  2. William P. Rogers, Attorney General of the United States v. Schering Corporation, Hexagon Laboratories, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
  3. Rogers v. Schering CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1958
  4. Sandoval v. RodriguezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Bank of Philippine Islands v. RogersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API