Legal Opinion

Simonian v. University & Community College System of Nevada

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 2006No. 39292PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In this proper person appeal, we determine whether the district court properly granted summary judgment to the University and Community College System of Nevada (UCCSN) because, as a state entity, UCCSN is not subject to liability under Nevada’s False Claims Act (FCA).1 We also consider whether sanctions may be imposed on a complainant for having filed an FCA action based on allegations that, in the context of an administrative retaliation proceeding, were previously found meritless.

We agree with the district court that UCCSN is a state entity and therefore not subject to FCA…

3Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. United States v. Cooper Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Wood v. Safeway, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2005

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cuzze v. University & Community College SystemNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Cuzze v. Univ. & Cmty. Coll. Sys. of Nev.Nevada Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Lehrer McGovern Bovis, Inc. v. Bullock Insulation, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2008
  4. United States ex rel. Kroening v. Forest Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2016
  5. Simonian v. Univ. & Cmty. Coll. Sys.Nevada Supreme Court · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API