Legal Opinion

22 Employee Benefits Cas. 1765, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6468, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6892, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9544, Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23947e Gary Emard v. Hughes Aircraft Company, a Corporation Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, a Corporation Alex Stencel

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 20, 1998No. 96-56584Published

1Opinion of the Court

153 F.3d 949

22 Employee Benefits Cas. 1765, 98 Cal. Daily

Op. Serv. 6468,

98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6892,

98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9544,

Pens. Plan Guide (CCH) P 23947E

Gary EMARD, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

HUGHES AIRCRAFT COMPANY, a corporation; Metropolitan Life

Insurance Company, a corporation; Alex Stencel,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-56584.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued Feb. 2, 1998.

Submitted Feb. 12, 1998.

Decided Aug. 20, 1998.

Gerald N. Shelley, Costa Mesa, California, for plaintiff-appellant.

Ralph R. Loyd, Horwitz & Beam, Irvine, California, for defendant-appellee Alex Stencel.

Ap…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API