Legal Opinion

United States v. Booth

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 24, 1983No. 81-771, 81-772PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERREN, Associate Judge:

The government appeals from a trial court ruling suppressing evidentiary use of statements by appellee White, as well as a broom handle that appellees allegedly used to assault the complaining witness. The court concluded that the statements and the broom handle were fruits of an unlawful police entry into the front hall of a rooming house where appellees resided. We reject the government’s contention that appellees had no legitimate expectation of privacy in the front hallway of their rooming house, and thus lacked standing to challenge the police officer’s actions.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. State v. FisherArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Good v. Dauphin County Social Services For Children And YouthCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  4. Jamel Evans v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Earle v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API