Legal Opinion

Barham v. Vickers

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1922No. 17344PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

— The plaintiff by this action sought to recover $3,000. Judgment was entered by the trial court in his favor for $1,000. He appeals from that part of the judgment denying him a full recovery, and the defendant appeals from the judgment for $1,000 rendered against him.

The facts are not greatly in dispute. The Norway Pacific Construction & Drydock Company, in October, 1918, by a written order, placed with the defendant,, -agreed to purchase a certain described angle planer for $8,000, f. o. b. Pittsburg, Pennsylvania, payable $2,000 cash with order, the balance to be paid on sight draft with…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Parker v. Advance Thresher Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brower Co. v. Noise Control of Seattle, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API