People v. Roman
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
At the opening of his trial defendant’s counsel requested that defendant be permitted to wear his own street clothing as is usual during the trial. The Court refused "this request and defendant was obliged to appear during his trial wearing 'distinctive prison attire, not otherwise described in the record. The District Attorney concedes that the People can *979advance no reason why it was necessary to try this defendant in prison uniform.
A defendant is presumed innocent and he is entitled tp appear in court with the dignity and the self-respect of a free and innocent man. To forbid him to wear…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States of America Ex Rel. Alfred Stahl v. C. Murray Henderson, Warden, Louisiana State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Donald A. Bentley, Jr. v. Roger W. Crist, Warden of Montana State Prison, and the State of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Williams v. EstelleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
3Cited by41 opinions
- Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State ex rel. McMannis v. MohnWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
- George C. Gilmore v. Bill Armontrout, George C. Gilmore v. Bill ArmontroutCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- People v. HarperNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. ConnorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.