Hubbard v. Farrell
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Bartholomew Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Black, C.
The only alleged error is the overruling of a motion for a new trial, the action being upon a claim in favor of the appellee against the estate of Charles A. Hubbard,, deceased. The first four of the six causes stated in the motion presented, in different forms, the question whether the findingwassustained by sufficient legal evidence. The appellee proved on the trial that two judgments were rendered before a justice-of the peace in actions upon promissory notes against said Charles A. Hubbard, and that the appellee became replevin bail on each of said judgments on the 1st of August,…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Shockey v. MillsIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Evans v. CareySupreme Court of Alabama · 1856
- Brownlee v. KenneippIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Dearing v. MoffittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1844
- Chamberlain v. ReidIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sundling v. WilleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
- Cheney v. BargeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1888
- Meech v. LamonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885