Legal Opinion

State v. Forseth

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1986No. TC 13993; CA A33445; SC S32229PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*235CARSON, J.

On December 8, 1983, county sheriff personnel and local and state police officers executed a search warrant on defendant’s residence in Prineville. While executing the warrant, which was for “the controlled substance marijuana and evidence of its use and possession,” the officers discovered two small vials. One vial was made of amber, transparent glass; the other was clear glass. Both were visually examined without being opened. The officers observed that each contained a white powdery substance. Defendant was not present at his residence during the search.

Numerous items of drug…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. LowryOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. WestlundOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. WestlundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. FarrarOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. MunroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. State v. BallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. State v. ForsethOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. GothamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API