Legal Opinion

Barker v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 29, 2000No. 1999-CA-000500-MRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BUCKINGHAM, Judge.

As the result of an arrest for operating a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol (DUI), Steven Barker was convicted in the Clark County Circuit Court of DUI, *516third offense (DUI III), which, by virtue of his blood alcohol level exceeding 0.18, is a Class D felony. KRS1 189A.010(4)(e). Barker argues that the operative statute is unconstitutionally vague and hence must be rendered void and that his conviction therefore must be vacated. Having reviewed and analyzed the applicable law, we affirm.

On October 18, 1998, Barker was arrested for suspected DUI and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Commonwealth v. WirthKentucky Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Commonwealth v. KashCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1997
  5. Beach v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Health Department v. LloydCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2003
  2. LEXINGTON-FAYETTE URBAN CTY HEALTH v. LloydCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API