Legal Opinion

Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Bogart

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1999No. 99-388PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. A stayed suspension with the conditions recommended by the board is an appropriate sanction for respondent’s misconduct and will assure that he receives the assistance necessary to treat his alcohol addiction and related dependency problems. See, e.g., Disciplinary Counsel v. Maxwell (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 7, 697 N.E.2d 597, and Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Baas (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 293, 681 N.E.2d 421, where we imposed similar sanctions for misconduct that included violations of DR 1-102(A)(6) and evidence of alcohol abuse.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. BaasOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. MaxwellOhio Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. BogartOhio Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API