Oliver v. Labor Commission
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Decision
TOOMEY, Judge:
{1 Mark L. Oliver seeks judicial review of the Utah Labor Commission's denial of permanent total disability benefits relating to an industrial accident. Because the Commission erred in its determination that Oliver's work-related injuries do not limit his ability to do basic work activities and do not prevent him from performing the essential functions of the job he was qualified for at the time of his accident, we set aside its order and allow the Administrative Law Judge's order, granting benefits to Oliver, to stand.
12 In March 2000, while working for D.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. NielsenUtah Supreme Court · 2014
- Olsen v. Eagle Mountain CityUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- Murray v. Utah Labor CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2013
- Martinez v. Media-Paymaster Plus/Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day SaintsUtah Supreme Court · 2007
- Provo City v. Utah Labor CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Oliver v. Utah Labor Comm'nUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- Hutchings v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
- Quast v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
- Guzman v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015