Sumners. v. Hickss.
Supreme Court of the United States
Appeal from tbe District Court of tbe United States for tbe District of Wisconsin. .
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swayne
This is a suit in equity, having for its object, to set aside two assignments made by the defendants, Henry Hicks and Asa Hicks, to their co-defendant, Eorbes.
The appellants are the complainants in the bill. They have recovered judgments at law against Henry and Asa Hicks, upon which executions have been, returned unsatisfied.
The first assignment was executed on the 4th of January, 1858. The conveyance of the property is followed in the instrument by this provision: “In trust nevertheless, and to and for the following uses, interests and purposes, that is to say, That the said party of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Burdick v. Post & HunttingNew York Supreme Court · 1851
- Inloes v. American Exchange BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1857
- Foster v. SimmonsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · 1806
- Rogers v. De ForestNew York Court of Chancery · 1838
- Whitney v. KrowsNew York Supreme Court · 1851
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Union Bank of Chicago v. Kansas City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Jones v. Guaranty & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Robinson & Co. v. BeltSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- First Nat. Bank v. GlassCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
- Jaffray v. McGeheeSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.