Legal Opinion

Smith v. Fischer

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 5, 2015No. 14-3857PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff Brunce Smith moves for appointment of counsel in his appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (D’Agostino, /.), entered on September 26, 2014, dismissing his complaint on summary judgment. The underlying issue is whether an inmate may implicitly waive his right to attend a disciplinary hearing. Extending our reasoning in Bedoya v. Coughlin, 91 F.3d 349 (2d Cir.1996) (holding that an inmate may waive his right to call witnesses by remaining silent), we conclude that an inmate may likewise implicitly waive the right to attend his…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Ben Gary Triestman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  4. Bennie Cooper v. A. Sargenti Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  5. Gary Wayne Freeman v. Richard RideoutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Elder v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
  2. Alvarez v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  3. Castillo v. SnedekerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
  4. Cavienss v. Norwak TransitDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
  5. Cavienss v. Norwak TransitDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API