Legal Opinion
Abrams v. American Tennis Courts, Inc.
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided December 9, 2004No. 2517, September Term, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSalmon, J.
Carl Abrams filed a complaint in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County against his former employer, American Tennis Courts, Inc. (“ATC”). ATC filed a motion for summary judgment, which was granted on the basis that Abrams was barred by the doctrine of judicial estoppel from filing the complaint. Summary judgment was entered in favor of ATC.
The sole question presented in this appeal is whether the trial court erred when it granted summary judgment on the ground that Abrams was judicially estopped from pursuing his claim.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Carl Abrams (“Abrams”) brought a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Harry F. Chaveriat, Jr. v. Williams Pipe Line CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Matthew SIMON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SAFELITE GLASS CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Astrid L. Portela-Gonzalez v. Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Board of License Commissioners v. Corridor Wine, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chesley v. City of AnnapolisCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. HansonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Boston Scientific Corp. v. Mirowski Family Ventures, LLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2016