Legal Opinion
Yancsek v. Hull Corp.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 8, 1985PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
204 N.J. Super. 429 (1985)
499 A.2d 242
CHRISTINE YANCSEK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
THE HULL CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Submitted September 10, 1985.
Decided October 8, 1985.
Before Judges DREIER, BILDER and GRUCCIO.
Nusbaum, Stein, Goldstein & Bronstein, attorneys for appellant (Arthur Z. Charsinsky, on the brief).
Velardo & Koprowski, attorneys for respondent (Walter Koprowski, Jr., on the brief).
The opinion of the court was delivered by DREIER, J.A.D.
Plaintiff has appealed from an order of the Law Division denying reinstatement and restoration…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lopez v. SwyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Marder v. Realty Construction Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
- Coons v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Marder v. Realty Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Honda Motor Company, Ltd. v. Walter P. CoonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Connors v. Sexton Studios, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- State v. FarrellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
- TALL TIMBERS PR. OWN. ASS'N v. Tall Timbers, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987