Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1932No. 23359PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action in mandamus. The relator was, in 1920, in the employ of an employer who was then subject to the Workmen's Compensation Laws of Ohio. In the course of and arising out of that employment, the relator suffered an accidental injury, serious in character, to his left leg below the knee, and to his left foot.

Applications were duly made by the relator for awards covering damages sustained. Awards were made and paid until the total sum of $1,150.27 had been paid to cover temporary total disability, and a further total sum of $2,168.44 had been paid to apply on temporary partial…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hammond v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1935
  3. State ex rel. Szalay v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API