Legal Opinion

Kanaley v. Brennan

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1983PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

William R. Roy, J.

This CPLR article 78 proceeding is brought by petitioners to annul a determination of the Planning Board of the Town of Onondaga which approved a cluster development in that town, pursuant to section 281 of the Town Law.

Petitioners are owners of realty either adjoining or near to the property which is the subject of this proceeding, and their right to maintain this review is not in issue. Respondents, Buechners and Wincrest Acres II, have been permitted to intervene by order of Hon. Thomas J. Murphy, dated March 8,1983. Prior thereto and on February…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. H.O.M.E.S. v. New York State Urban Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  2. Hiscox v. LevineNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Daly v. EaganNew York Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Rouse v. O'ConnellNew York Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Kamhi v. Planning BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Friends of Shawangunks, Inc. v. KnowltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Bayswater Realty & Capital Corp. v. Planning BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. In re New York Archaeological Council v. Town Board of CoxsackieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. Purchase Environmental Protective Ass'n v. Town Board of the TownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. Friends of Shawangunks, Inc. v. KnowltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API