Legal Opinion

Harlan E. Baxter and Imogene Baxter v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Lovell J. Proby and Eva M. Proby v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 14, 1970No. 24736, 24868PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODWIN, Judge:

Two decisions of the Tax Court are combined for review. Taxpayers Harlan and Imogene Baxter seek to reverse a decision in favor of the Commissioner, and Taxpayers Lovell and Eva Proby seek to sustain a decision in their favor against the Commissioner. The Commissioner seeks review of the Proby decision only by way of a protective petition, i. e., asking reversal of Proby only if the Baxter decision is reversed.

The facts, substantially as found by the Tax Court, are summarized as follows:

Between 1945 and 1959, Proby developed a profitable business selling traffic-light systems…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. John W. Rogers and Creta B. Rogers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Palo Alto Town & Country Village, Inc. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  2. General Dynamics Corp. v. BullockTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Carl E. Mathena and Helen B. Mathena, and v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  4. Palo Alto Town & Country Village, Inc. v. Commissioner Of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  5. Chiappetti v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API