Dorn v. Fox
New York Supreme Court
This action was brought to compel the collectors of taxes for the towns of Ava and Booneville, Oneida county, to inter-plead and settle between themselves conflicting claims for taxes against the defendant’s farm, which was situated partly in each of these adjacent towns. The facts are stated in opinion of the court
1Opinion of the CourtMullin, P. J.
The plaintiff alleges, in his complaint, that he owns a farm lying partly in the town of Ava and partly in the town of Booneville, in the county of Oneida; that *163he lived on the part lying in Booneville in the summer of 1869.
In that year he was assessed for the whole of said farm in the town of Ava, and the tax upon said farm was forty-one dollars and eighty-fifty cents.
He was assessed in the same year for the whole of said farm in the town of Booneville, and the tax upon that farm in that town was sixty-one dollars.
Warrants have been issued in both towns for the collection of said taxes. He…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mygatt v. . WashburnNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Mohawk & Hudson Railroad v. CluteNew York Court of Chancery · 1834
- People ex rel. Davis v. GardnerNew York Supreme Court · 1871
- Baldwin v. Van DeusenNew York Court of Appeals · 1868