Legal Opinion · Dissent

Adkins v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1973No. 44876Published

1DissentJustice Goldenhersh

I dissent. I agree with the circuit and appellate courts that upon this record the doctrine of forum non conveniens is clearly inapplicable and assuming, arguendo, that there was an issue here of forum non conveniens, the majority have disregarded the rule that the trial court’s decision will not be disturbed unless the record shows an abuse of discretion.

Prior to discussing the legal issues it is essential to correct a factual error in the majority opinion. The majority states: “The collision with which the action is concerned took place in Iowa, over 200 miles from Rock Island, Illinois.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Schmitt v. Jenkins Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  3. Whitney v. MaddenIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Robert W. Johnston v. H. G. Cartwright, Kiowa Corporation, Walter Brown and H. G. Cartwright v. Robert W. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
  5. Lonergan v. Crucible Steel Co. of AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API