Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Smith

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 20, 1981No. 1359Published

1DissentSpaeth, Judge

In Commonwealth v. Starks, 490 Pa. 336, 416 A.2d 498 (1980), the Supreme Court stated that a retrial is barred by “prosecutorial misconduct undertaken in bad faith to prejudice or harass the defendant.” Id., 490 Pa. at 342, 416 A.2d at 500. In my opinion, the record here discloses such conduct.

-1-

The evidence consisted of the testimony of two individuals: the Commonwealth’s witness, Pettaway; and appellant.

Pettaway’s testimony may be summarized as follows: Pettaway and his partner were on duty as security guards at a grocery store. They were in full uniform, and armed with guns, nightsticks,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Breed v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Lee v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Commonwealth v. BighumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Commonwealth v. PetrakovichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API