Legal Opinion · Dissent

Spinella v. New York City Railway Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 26, 1905Published

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Fourth District. Action by Pietro Spinella against the New York City Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Dissent

MacLEAN, J..(dissenting).

In view of the divergence of the testimony of the plaintiff and that of his witnesses, and of his sworn statement in his particulars and upon the stand, relative to the number of the car and the employes in charge, as well as for excessive damages, the judgment rendered herein in favor of the plaintiff should, in the interest of justice and in keeping with the remarks of the court in Streicher v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 39 App. Div. 658, 57 N. Y. Supp. 716, be set aside, and a new trial ordered. Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Streicher v. Third Avenue RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API