Mt. Sexton Properties, Inc. v. Department of Revenue
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
This case presents the question whether plaintiff-taxpayers must receive specific notice of the judicial review of the Department of Revenue’s determination of forest land values before those values can be used by county assessors to determine the property tax assessment for plaintiffs’ land. Plaintiffs claim that the statutory scheme of notice and the notice of judicial review of the Department’s valuations provided through publication were inadequate, so that an application of the Department’s property values to plaintiffs’ land is a violation of plaintiffs’ due process 1 rights when that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Greene v. LindseySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Utley v. St. PetersburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 12 OF WASCO CTY. v. Wasco CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hayes Oyster Co. v. DEQCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- Advance Resorts of America, Inc. v. City of WheelerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Citizens National Bank of St. Albans v. DunnawayWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
- Tilbury v. Multnomah CountyOregon Tax Court · 1994