Legal Opinion

Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad v. Shepley

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 1876PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. . cited: Oelrihcs m Spain, 15 Wall. 211; Gadsden v. Bank of Georgetown, 5 Eicli. 336-346 ; Corder v. Martin, 17 Mo. 42, 43. cited: Uhrig v. City of St. Louis, -47 Mo. 528 ; State, to use, v. Beldsmeier, 56 Mo. 226 ; Eose ■y. Thomas, 19 Mo. 613 ; Hayden & Smith v. Sample, 10 Mo. "215 ; Edwards v. Bodins, 11 Paige, 223 ; Corcoran v. Judson, 24 N. Y. 106 ; Garret v. Logan, 19 Ala. (n. s.) 344 ; Sedgw. on Dam.

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. . cited: Oelrihcs m Spain, 15 Wall. 211; Gadsden v. Bank of Georgetown, 5 Eicli. 336-346 ; Corder v. Martin, 17 Mo. 42, 43. cited: Uhrig v. City of St. Louis, -47 Mo. 528 ; State, to use, v. Beldsmeier, 56 Mo. 226 ; Eose ■y. Thomas, 19 Mo. 613 ; Hayden & Smith v. Sample, 10 Mo. "215 ; Edwards v. Bodins, 11 Paige, 223 ; Corcoran v. Judson, 24 N. Y. 106 ; Garret v. Logan, 19 Ala. (n. s.) 344 ; Sedgw. on Dam. (5th ed.) note, top p. 488, side p. 397 ; 15 Wall. 211.

1Opinion of the CourtBakewell, J.

This is an action on a bond executed by appellants, on •behalf of the plaintiff, in an injunction suit brought by one .John Bailey against the Hannibal & St. Joseph Eailroad •Company, in the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Missouri. The bond is conditioned that the ¡said Bailey shall pay the Hannibal & St. Joseph Eailroad •Company any damages or costs that might accrue to it or •be occasioned by the injunction. The injunction was dissolved on hearing, the suit dismissed, and that decree ¡-affirmed on appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States. The breach assigned…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Oelrichs v. SpainSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Arcambel v. WisemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1796
  3. Edwards v. BodineNew York Court of Chancery · 1844
  4. State ex rel. Clifford v. BeldsmeierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  5. Uhrig v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mulvane v. TullockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  2. Wash v. LacklandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. Elliott v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API