Legal Opinion
Liverpool & London & Globe Ins. v. Dillon
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided January 11, 1927No. 2513PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Circuit Judge.
This was an action at law to recover upon a policy of fire insurance on a stock of goods. The company filed specifications of defense under the practice in West Virginia, setting up that insured had not complied with the iron safe clause, and had not filed proofs of loss in accordance with the terms of the policy. At the conclusion of the evidence, the company moved for a directed verdict, which was denied by the trial judge, and the correctness of this ruling is the only point presented by the writ of error. The assignments of error do indeed present one other point…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Tayloe v. Merchants' Fire Ins. Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- The Columbia Insurance Company of Alexandria, in Error v. Joseph W. Lawrence, Who Survived Thomas PoindexterSupreme Court of the United States · 1836
- Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. KearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. EllingtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Rheims v. Standard Fire Ins.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Maynard v. National Fire Insurance Co. of HartfordWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
- Wayne v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- Bennett v. Cosmopolitan Fire Ins.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. American Ins.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
- American Mutual Liability Insurance Company v. Thomas & Howard Company of Columbia, South CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.