Legal Opinion

Wright v. Barnard Bros.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 10, 1893PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Lucas District Gomrt. — Hon. W. I. Babb, Judge. Action to recover possession of specific personal property. There was a trial by the court without a jury, anda judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The intervenor appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Robinson, O. J.

In October, 1891, the plaintiff was the owner of a black stallion named Keno Second, and the defendants, Bernard Bros., owned a stock farm and stock near Chariton. The defendants asked the plaintiff what would buy the horse, and, when told, said they could not use him at that price. They were asked what they would give, and answered seven hundred dollars. The plaintiff -refused to sell for that sum, but finally said he would take eight hundred dollars. cash for the horse. The defendants said they thought they could use him at that price, and asked the plaintiff *167to take him to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chickering v. BastressIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Farquhar v. McAlevy, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Huntingdon County1891
  3. Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. HolcombSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874
  4. Moline Plow Co. v. BradenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  5. Budlong v. CottrellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Norwegian Plow Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  2. Donnelly v. MitchellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  3. Greenlease-Lied Motors v. SadlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  4. Maxwell Motor Sales Corp. v. Bankers Mortgage & Securities Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  5. Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. LawsonDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API