Legal Opinion

State v. Hibicke

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1953PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

“The granting of a new trial in the interest of justice is highly discretionary, and the order, although reviewable, will not be reversed by the supreme court unless it clearly appears that there was an abuse of judicial discretion.” Syllabus, Kies v. Hopper (1945), 247 Wis. 208, 19 N. W. (2d) 167.

We need examine the trial court’s reasons no further than to find one sufficient to justify the order for the new trial as an act within the trial court’s discretion.

During the trial, to a question by the court, counsel for the state replied that it was essential to the state’s case that an…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kies v. HopperWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. TroncaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. WatersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State v. SchmitCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
  4. State v. BowlingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  5. Mamodoh Abouemara v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2023

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API