Legal Opinion

Moffat v. New York Edison Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 7, 1909Published

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Fifth District. Action by Walter Moffat against the New York Edison Company.. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

1Per curiam

The action is for the penalty provided in section 65 of the transportation corporations law (Laws 1890, p. 1148, c. 566). for the neglect and refusal of defendant to supply plaintiff with electricity. The court found for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

The electricity was cut off, and plaintiff wrote demanding the reason therefor. A rather long correspondence took place, and in many letters plaintiff demanded that the electricity be supplied, while defendant insisted on plaintiff’s signing a written contract prepared by defendant. Plaintiff wrote:

“I desire you to restore the connection and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jones v. Rochester Gas & Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  2. Bennett v. Eastchester Gas Light Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  3. Jones v. Rochester Gas & Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  4. Jones v. Rochester Gas & Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API