Legal Opinion

H. Hackfeld & Co. v. Bal

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1882PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the Court

Decision of

Judd, C.J.

This is a bill in equity, alleging that at the last October Term of the Supreme Court the plaintiffs brought an action against the defendants, claiming $38,881.68 on a book account, and that their declaration was afterwards amended by inserting the name of G. Armstrong; as a ■ co-defendant. That at the last January Term of this Court the jury rendered a verdict for the defendant Bal, but no answer or appearance was made for Armstrong, and no verdict or judgment rendered or made as respects him. That' final judgment in favor of said Bal has been rendered, and costs taxed…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Norris v. de HerblayHawaii Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Scott v. PilipoHawaii Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API