Legal Opinion

United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Munroe-Langstroth, Inc. v. Joseph W. Praught, D/B/A J. W. Praught Company

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided August 31, 1959No. 5476PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODBURY, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from so much of a judgment entered in an action under the Miller Act, 49 Stat. 793, 40 U.S.C.A. §§ 270a-270d, as disallowed the use plaintiff’s claim for the cost of constructing a cofferdam. There is no serious dispute over the basic facts which for present purposes can be stated in summary fashion as follows:

The defendant Praught entered into a contract with the United States acting by and through the Department of the Navy to construct additions to the heating plant at the United States Naval Air Station in Brunswick, Maine, and gave a performance…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. JW Bateson Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Bd. of Trustees of Nat. Automatic Sprinkler Industry Pension FundSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Continental Casualty Company, a Corporation v. The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of the Robertson Lumbercompany, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  3. Gerhold Concrete Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. United States ex rel. Westinghouse Electric v. James Stewart Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  5. United States ex rel. Brown Bros. Grading Co. v. F. D. Rich Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API