Legal Opinion · Concurrence
Rooney v. CITY OF EAST CHICAGO
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided December 5, 1958No. 19,009Published
1Concurrence
Concurring Opinion.
Royse, P. J.
I do not agree with the Per Curiam opinion of the majority that the Clerk was without authority to dismiss this case under the provisions of Rule 2-15 of the Rules of the Supreme Court. In my opinion this holding is a perversion of the intent and purpose of this Rule of the Supreme Court.
I agree that the case should be dismissed.
Note. — Reported in 148 N. E. 2d 842.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Rooney v. CITY OF EAST CHICAGOIndiana Court of Appeals · 1958