Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Rooney v. CITY OF EAST CHICAGO

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 5, 1958No. 19,009Published

1Concurrence

Concurring Opinion.

Royse, P. J.

I do not agree with the Per Curiam opinion of the majority that the Clerk was without authority to dismiss this case under the provisions of Rule 2-15 of the Rules of the Supreme Court. In my opinion this holding is a perversion of the intent and purpose of this Rule of the Supreme Court.

I agree that the case should be dismissed.

Note. — Reported in 148 N. E. 2d 842.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rooney v. CITY OF EAST CHICAGOIndiana Court of Appeals · 1958