Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Stephen v. Hanifan

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1880PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Fourth District;— heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Clair county; the Hon. Amos Watts, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

This was a proceeding in the nature of a quo warranto, against Thomas Hanifan, to require him to show by what authority he assumed to exercise the duties of alderman of the second ward of the city of East St. Louis. The principal facts are not a matter of disagreement between the parties.

It appears the city of East St. Louis was incorporated under a special charter, and was divided into four wards. On the first Tuesday of April, 1878, the term of one aider-man for each ward in the city expired, and one from each ward held over. At the regular election for municipal officers held on that day,…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Myers v. HaasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908
  2. Foltz v. KerlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. State ex rel. Crawford v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  4. Rogers v. Village of Tinley ParkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  5. People ex rel. Dinneen v. BradfordIllinois Supreme Court · 1915

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API