Legal Opinion

Bradford v. Hanover Fire Ins. Co. of New York

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 14, 1900No. 25PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania.

1Opinion of the Court

DALLAS, Circuit Judge.

The proceeding under review is an action of tort. It was brought by an insurance company, the defendant in error, against the plaintiff in error, to recover “damages resulting from the defendant’s negligence and misfeasance in the discharge of his duties as agent of the plaintiff company in the business of insuring the owners of property, real and personal, from loss by fire.” The cause of action as more specifically alleged was that, although the defendant had been instructed to insure no potteries, “yet the said defendant, well knowing his instructions and his duty in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dickerson v. ColgroveSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Brunner v. American Telegraph & Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  3. Hower v. UlrichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  4. Seeber v. Commercial Nat. BankU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Utah · 1897

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Andrus v. BradleyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API