Legal Opinion

Clark v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 11, 1996No. 96-1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Clark invokes Ride 3.800, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, to assert that he was erroneously sentenced as an habitual offender because the earliest of his two prior felonies was not committed within five years of the felony for which he was sentenced. In making his claim, Clark has misinterpreted section 775.084(1), Florida Statutes! Subsection 775.084(l)(a)2, Florida Statutes, requires only that a defendant’s last prior felony or qualified offense conviction be within five years of the date of the current felony offense. Clark’s conviction of burglary of a structure in Florida in 1994 is…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Middleton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  2. Edwards v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  3. Turner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  4. RAUL J. MARI v. THE STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API